The Frontier Beyond Open Access Publishing? Commoning | David Bollier

MikeRoy's bookmarks 2020-07-28


David Bollier , commons scholar and activist, writes a glowing review of  “Labour of Love: An Open Access Manifesto for Freedom, integrity, and Creativity in the Humanities and Interpretive Social Sciences,” by Andreas E. Pia, Simon Batterbury, and eleven other colleagues, helping to explain why it is that Open Access really hasn't worked out as hoped. He writes

"It turns out that the social system for generating, curating and maintain knowledge is critical to how that knowledge can circulate. As more scholars are discovering, open and closed are both compatible with predatory forms of corporate control – high subscription fees, limited user access, copyright and contract restrictions, encrypted formats, and even outright censorship in response to nations like China.

Commoning, by contrast, puts the responsibilities and entitlements of commoners as the primary goal. This helps to ensure that peer-generated knowledge is accessible and shared in ways that are free, fair, and respectful.   "



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » MikeRoy's bookmarks


oa.advocacy oa.business_models oa.commons

Date tagged:

07/28/2020, 06:50

Date published:

07/28/2020, 02:50