Reusability of filtering facepiece respirators after decontamination through drying and germicidal UV irradiation
Zotero / K4D COVID-19 Health Evidence Summaries Group / Top-Level Items 2020-11-03
Type
Journal Article
Author
David Vernez
Author
Jonathan Save
Author
Anne Oppliger
Author
Nicolas Concha-Lozano
Author
Nancy B. Hopf
Author
Hélène Niculita-Hirzel
Author
Grégory Resch
Author
Véronique Michaud
Author
Laurie Dorange-Pattoret
Author
Nicole Charrière
Author
Kiattisak Batsungnoen
Author
Guillaume Suarez
URL
https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/10/e003110
Rights
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
e003110
Publication
BMJ Global Health
ISSN
2059-7908
Date
21/10/2020
Extra
Publisher: BMJ Specialist Journals
Section: Original research
PMID: 33087392
DOI
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003110
Library Catalog
gh.bmj.com
Language
en
Abstract
Introduction During pandemics, such as the SARS-CoV-2, filtering facepiece respirators plays an essential role in protecting healthcare personnel. The recycling of respirators is possible in case of critical shortage, but it raises the question of the effectiveness of decontamination as well as the performance of the reused respirators.
Method Disposable respirators were subjected to ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) treatment at single or successive doses of 60 mJ/cm2 after a short drying cycle (30 min, 70°C). The germicidal efficacy of this treatment was tested by spiking respirators with two staphylococcal bacteriophages (vB_HSa_2002 and P66 phages). The respirator performance was investigated by the following parameters: particle penetration (NaCl aerosol, 10–300 nm), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry and mechanical tensile tests.
Results No viable phage particles were recovered from any of the respirators after decontamination (log reduction in virus titre >3), and no reduction in chemical or physical properties (SEM, particle penetrations <5%–6%) were observed. Increasing the UVGI dose 10-fold led to chemical alterations of the respirator filtration media (FTIR) but did not affect the physical properties (particle penetration), which was unaltered even at 3000 mJ/cm2 (50 cycles). When respirators had been used by healthcare workers and undergone decontamination, they had particle penetration significantly greater than never donned respirators.
Conclusion This decontamination procedure is an attractive method for respirators in case of shortages during a SARS pandemic. A successful implementation requires a careful design and particle penetration performance control tests over the successive reuse cycles.