Phase 1–2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine
Zotero / K4D COVID-19 Health Evidence Summaries Group / Top-Level Items 2020-12-31
Type
Journal Article
Author
Cheryl Keech
Author
Gary Albert
Author
Iksung Cho
Author
Andreana Robertson
Author
Patricia Reed
Author
Susan Neal
Author
Joyce S. Plested
Author
Mingzhu Zhu
Author
Shane Cloney-Clark
Author
Haixia Zhou
Author
Gale Smith
Author
Nita Patel
Author
Matthew B. Frieman
Author
Robert E. Haupt
Author
James Logue
Author
Marisa McGrath
Author
Stuart Weston
Author
Pedro A. Piedra
Author
Chinar Desai
Author
Kathleen Callahan
Author
Maggie Lewis
Author
Patricia Price-Abbott
Author
Neil Formica
Author
Vivek Shinde
Author
Louis Fries
Author
Jason D. Lickliter
Author
Paul Griffin
Author
Bethanie Wilkinson
Author
Gregory M. Glenn
URL
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2026920
Rights
Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Publication
New England Journal of Medicine
Date
10/12/2020
Loc. in Archive
world
Extra
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa2026920
Library Catalog
www.nejm.org
Language
en
Abstract
Original Article from The New England Journal of Medicine — Phase 1–2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine
Background
NVX-CoV2373 is a recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (rSARS-CoV-2) nanoparticle vaccine composed of trimeric full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins and Matrix-M1 adjuvant.
Methods
We initiated a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1–2 trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the rSARS-CoV-2 vaccine (in 5-μg and 25-μg doses, with or without Matrix-M1 adjuvant, and with observers unaware of trial-group assignments) in 131 healthy adults. In phase 1, vaccination comprised two intramuscular injections, 21 days apart. The primary outcomes were reactogenicity; laboratory values (serum chemistry and hematology), according to Food and Drug Administration toxicity scoring, to assess safety; and IgG anti–spike protein response (in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] units). Secondary outcomes included unsolicited adverse events, wild-type virus neutralization (microneutralization assay), and T-cell responses (cytokine staining). IgG and microneutralization assay results were compared with 32 (IgG) and 29 (neutralization) convalescent serum samples from patients with Covid-19, most of whom were symptomatic. We performed a primary analysis at day 35.
Results
After randomization, 83 participants were assigned to receive the vaccine with adjuvant and 25 without adjuvant, and 23 participants were assigned to receive placebo. No serious adverse events were noted. Reactogenicity was absent or mild in the majority of participants, more common with adjuvant, and of short duration (mean, ≤2 days). One participant had mild fever that lasted 1 day. Unsolicited adverse events were mild in most participants; there were no severe adverse events. The addition of adjuvant resulted in enhanced immune responses, was antigen dose–sparing, and induced a T helper 1 (Th1) response. The two-dose 5-μg adjuvanted regimen induced geometric mean anti-spike IgG (63,160 ELISA units) and neutralization (3906) responses that exceeded geometric mean responses in convalescent serum from mostly symptomatic Covid-19 patients (8344 and 983, respectively).