Safety and immunogenicity of INO-4800 DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary report of an open-label, Phase 1 clinical trial
Zotero / K4D COVID-19 Health Evidence Summaries Group / Top-Level Items 2021-08-25
Type
Journal Article
Author
Pablo Tebas
Author
ShuPing Yang
Author
Jean D. Boyer
Author
Emma L. Reuschel
Author
Ami Patel
Author
Aaron Christensen-Quick
Author
Viviane M. Andrade
Author
Matthew P. Morrow
Author
Kimberly Kraynyak
Author
Joseph Agnes
Author
Mansi Purwar
Author
Albert Sylvester
Author
Jan Pawlicki
Author
Elisabeth Gillespie
Author
Igor Maricic
Author
Faraz I. Zaidi
Author
Kevin Y. Kim
Author
Yaya Dia
Author
Drew Frase
Author
Patrick Pezzoli
Author
Katherine Schultheis
Author
Trevor R. F. Smith
Author
Stephanie J. Ramos
Author
Trevor McMullan
Author
Karen Buttigieg
Author
Miles W. Carroll
Author
John Ervin
Author
Malissa C. Diehl
Author
Elliott Blackwood
Author
Mammen P. Mammen
Author
Jessica Lee
Author
Michael J. Dallas
Author
Ami Shah Brown
Author
Jacqueline E. Shea
Author
J. Joseph Kim
Author
David B. Weiner
Author
Kate E. Broderick
Author
Laurent M. Humeau
URL
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30433-8/abstract
Volume
31
Publication
EClinicalMedicine | The Lancet
ISSN
2589-5370
Date
23/12/2020
Extra
Publisher: Elsevier
PMID: 33392485
Journal Abbr
EClinicalMedicine
DOI
10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100689
Library Catalog
www.thelancet.com
Language
English
Abstract
Background
A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is of high urgency. Here the safety and immunogenicity induced by a DNA vaccine (INO-4800) targeting the full length spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 are described.
Methods
INO-4800 was evaluated in two groups of 20 participants, receiving either 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg of vaccine intradermally followed by CELLECTRA® EP at 0 and 4 weeks. Thirty-nine subjects completed both doses; one subject in the 2.0 mg group discontinued trial participation prior to receiving the second dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04336410.
• View related content for this article
Findings
The median age was 34.5, 55% (22/40) were men and 82.5% (33/40) white. Through week 8, only 6 related Grade 1 adverse events in 5 subjects were observed. None of these increased in frequency with the second administration. No serious adverse events were reported. All 38 subjects evaluable for immunogenicity had cellular and/or humoral immune responses following the second dose of INO-4800. By week 6, 95% (36/38) of the participants seroconverted based on their responses by generating binding (ELISA) and/or neutralizing antibodies (PRNT IC50), with responder geometric mean binding antibody titers of 655.5 [95% CI (255.6, 1681.0)] and 994.2 [95% CI (395.3, 2500.3)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. For neutralizing antibody, 78% (14/18) and 84% (16/19) generated a response with corresponding geometric mean titers of 102.3 [95% CI (37.4, 280.3)] and 63.5 [95% CI (39.6, 101.8)], in the respective groups. By week 8, 74% (14/19) and 100% (19/19) of subjects generated T cell responses by IFN-ɣ ELISpot assay with the median SFU per 106 PBMC of 46 [95% CI (21.1, 142.2)] and 71 [95% CI (32.2, 194.4)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. Flow cytometry demonstrated a T cell response, dominated by CD8+ T cells co-producing IFN-ɣ and TNF-α, without increase in IL-4.
Interpretation
INO-4800 demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability and was immunogenic in 100% (38/38) of the vaccinated subjects by eliciting either or both humoral or cellular immune responses.
Funding
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).
Short Title
Safety and immunogenicity of INO-4800 DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2