Opinion: Pros and Cons of Google vs. Subscription Databases

Items tagged with oa.google_scholar in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) 2021-11-12

Summary:

"During my time overseeing the library services department of a large school district, we found our subscription databases were generally a well-kept secret. The lack of trained school librarians available to teach these resources was part of the issue. But Google was ubiquitous, as was Wikipedia, and they became de facto research sources for students, despite their limitations for such a role. Google has its place for students and researchers (I used it for this article), as does Google Scholar (which I also used). But for students, subscription databases should also play a central research role, beginning with age-appropriate sources for elementary kids – like National Geographic – and moving up to "Gale in Context" for middle school students, and more scholarly articles for high schoolers from sources like ABC-CLIO...."  

Link:

https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/opinion-pros-and-cons-of-google-vs-subscription-databases

From feeds:

[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.google_scholar in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.wikipedia oa.usage oa.students oa.search oa.quality oa.libraries oa.google_scholar oa.google oa.credibility oa.comparisons comparisons

Date tagged:

11/12/2021, 08:43

Date published:

11/12/2021, 03:43