Which preprint server should I use? | Jabberwocky Ecology | The Weecology Blog

abernard102@gmail.com 2014-07-08

Summary:

"Preprints are rapidly becoming popular in biology as a way to speed up the process of science, get feedback on manuscripts prior to publication, and establish precedence (Desjardins-Proulx et al. 2013). Since biologists are still learning about preprints I regularly get asked which of the available preprint servers to use. Here’s the long-form version of my response. The good news is that you can’t go wrong right now. The posting of a preprint and telling people about it is far more important than the particular preprint server you choose. All of the major preprint servers are good choices.Of course you still need to pick one and the best way to do that is to think about the differences between available options. Here’s my take on four of the major preprint servers: arXiv, bioRxiv, PeerJ, and figshare ..."

Link:

http://jabberwocky.weecology.org/2014/07/07/which-preprint-server-should-i-use/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.preprints oa.green oa.repositories.disciplinary oa.arxiv oa.bioarxiv oa.peerj oa.figshare oa.versions oa.repositories

Date tagged:

07/08/2014, 07:21

Date published:

07/08/2014, 03:20