Open Access vs. neocolonialism? - Semantico
abernard102@gmail.com 2013-05-18
Summary:
Most of us have not failed to notice the sun rising on the asian century. If predictions of GDP growth are borne out, then by the time my kids are my age India will be ‘offshoring’ to the UK and middle-class Indians will no doubt be complaining that they don’t understand the accents of the operatives manning their bank’s outsourced call centre operation. The scholarly market is following, and will continue to follow, the same trends. China is predicted to take over as the largest economy on the planet around 2016 and will be the world’s greatest producer of scholarly articles; India is moving toward (albeit with some legislative resistance) updating its statute books to enable foreign universities to set up shop, which will start a gold rush. In considering Open Access as a fundamentally post-colonial idea, one should consider, then, that the anti-OA movement is expressing a shadowing, neocolonial ideal in that the subscription based access model favours fundamentally unequal relationships: it concentrates the knowledge of the many in the hands of the few and establishes significant economic barriers that act to separate the information rich from the information poor. This neocolonial outlook is exemplified in a recent post on Scholarly Open Access. This post bemoans that fact that (apparently) Hindawi’s profits are ‘bigger’ than Elsevier’s ..."