The Selected Papers Network (Part 2) | Azimuth

abernard102@gmail.com 2013-06-15

Summary:

"Last time Christopher Lee and I described some problems with scholarly publishing. The big problems are expensive journals and ineffective peer review. But we argued that solving these problems require new methods of • selection—assessing papers and • endorsement—making the quality of papers known, thus giving scholars the prestige they need to get jobs and promotions. The Selected Papers Network is an infrastructure for doing both these jobs in an open, distributed way. It’s not yet the solution to the big visible problems—just a framework upon which we can build those solutions. It’s just getting started, and it can use your help. But before I talk about where all this is heading, and how you can help, let me say what exists now. This is a bit dangerous, because if you’re not sure what a framework is for, and it’s not fully built yet, it can be confusing to see what’s been built so far! But if you’ve thought about the problems of scholarly publishing, you’re probably sick of hearing about dreams and hopes. You probably want to know what we’ve done so far. So let me start 
there.  SelectedPapers.net lets you recommend papers, comment on them, discuss them, or simply add them to your reading list.  But instead of 'locking up' your comments within its own website—the“walled garden” strategy followed by many other services—it explicitly shares these data in a way that people not on SelectedPapers.net can easily see. Any other service can see and use them too. It does this by using existing social networks—so that users of those social networks can see your recommendations and discuss them, even if they’ve never heard of SelectedPapers.net!  The idea is simple. You add some hashtags to let SelectedPapers.net know you’re talking to it, and to let it know which paper you’re talking about. It notices these hashtags and copies your comments over to its publicly accessible database.  So far Christopher Lee has got it working on Google+. So right now, if you’re a Google+ user, you can post comments on SelectedPapers.net using your usual Google+ identity and posting process, just by including suitable hashtags. Your post will be seen by your usual audience—but also by people visiting the SelectedPapers.net website, who don’t use Google+.  If you want to strip the idea down to one sentence, it’s this: 'Given that social networks already exist, all we need for truly open scientific communication is a convention on a consistent set of tags and IDs for discussing papers.'  That makes it possible to integrate discussion from all social networks—big and small—as a single unified forum. It’s a federated approach, rather than a single isolated website. And it won’t rely on any one social network: after Google+, we can get it working for Twitter and other networks and forums.  But more about the theory later. How, exactly, do you use it? ..."

Link:

http://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/the-selected-papers-network-part-2/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.open_science oa.peer_review oa.social_networks oa.selected_papers_network

Date tagged:

06/15/2013, 08:35

Date published:

06/15/2013, 04:35