Stepping back from sharing - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

abernard102@gmail.com 2015-05-05

Summary:

"The announcement from Elsevier about its new policies regarding author rights was a masterpiece of doublespeak, proclaiming that the company was “unleashing the power of sharing” while in fact tying up sharing in as many leashes as they could.  This is a retreat from open access, and it needs to be called out for what it is ... Attempting to catch up to reality, Elsevier announced last week that it was doing away with its punitive restriction that applied only to authors whose institutions had the temerity to support open access. They now call that policy 'complex' — it was really just ambiguous and unenforceable — and assert that they are 'simplifying' matters for Elsevier authors.  In reality they are simply punishing any authors who are foolish enough to publish under these terms.  Two major features of this retreat from openness need to be highlighted.  First, it imposes an embargo of at least one year on all self-archiving of final authors’ manuscripts, and those embargoes can be as long as four years.  Second, when the time finally does roll around when an author can make her own work available through an institutional repository, Elsevier now dictates how that access is to be controlled, mandating the most restrictive form of Creative Commons license, the CC-BY-NC-ND license for all green open access.  These embargoes are the principal feature of this new policy, and they are both complicated and draconian.  Far from making life simpler for authors, they now must navigate through several web pages to finally find the list of different embargo periods.  The list itself is 50 pages long, since each journal has its own embargo, but an effort to greatly extend the default expectation is obvious ... In any case, it is time, I believe, to look again at the boycott of Elsevier that was undertaken by many scholarly authors a few years ago; with this new salvo fired against the values of open scholarship, it is even more impossible to imagine a responsible author deciding to publish with Elsevier."

Link:

https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2015/05/04/stepping-back-from-sharing/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.elsevier oa.publishers oa.business_models oa.versions oa.copyright oa.licensing oa.gratis oa.embargoes oa.green oa.advocacy oa.boycotts oa.cost_of_knowledge oa.petitions oa.signatures oa.repositories oa.libre

Date tagged:

05/05/2015, 08:09

Date published:

05/05/2015, 04:09