Text Mining | Telepolis
abernard102@gmail.com 2015-06-19
Summary:
"Open science proponents no longer toil only with the open access to scientific articles and books or research data. Man fights these days just to be allowed to be able to evaluate scientific publications using text mining and data mining, and faces the resistance of publishers as rights holders exposed. While open access publications can be used openly by anyone, are closed-access publications only the scientists available for use, their institutions have purchased these works by publishers sale. To be more precise: they are the scientists ready only for reading but not for automatic evaluation by text mining and data mining. In principle it is technically relatively easy to do, evaluate machine for human analysis unworkable large masses of publications and research data through Text Mining or Data Mining. However Dement counter are the interests of publishers as rights holders who wish to stop this machine evaluation. They are sometimes harshly criticized for its obstructive attitude in science, are digital availability and the possibility of automatic evaluation but the feature par excellence of the data-driven science that makes statistical patterns in data-seas in order then to explain this scientifically. Which moveth resistance manifests itself among others in the The Hague Declaration , which calls for the establishment of a legal claim to mining ..."
Link:
http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/45/45203/1.htmlFrom feeds:
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.comOpen Access Tracking Project (OATP) » pontika.nancy@gmail.com's bookmarks