Imperial debate: light and heat on the RCUK open access policy | Reciprocal Space

abernard102@gmail.com 2012-10-13

Summary:

"It is two weeks since the meeting organised by the Imperial College Science Communication Forum to discuss the new open access policy announced by Research Councils UK (RCUK) in the light of the Finch Report. Richard Van Norden of Nature chaired an initial discussion between RCUK’s Mark Thorley and myself that kicked off a wide-ranging question and answer session. The audience was keen to probe the thinking behind the new policy and to explore how it might pan out in practice. You can listen to the entire discussion or, if pushed for time, follow the tweets in Jon Tennant’s Storify version, read Paul Jump’s report in the Times Higher Education or have a look at Ian Mulvaney’s thoughtful summary.  There is no need for me to rehash what was a very useful discussion but I did want to pull out the points that have struck me most on the night..."

Link:

http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/10/11/imperial-debate-light-and-heat-on-the-rcuk-open-access-policy/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.licensing oa.mining oa.comment oa.government oa.mandates oa.green oa.universities oa.copyright oa.cc oa.events oa.uk oa.costs oa.social_media oa.storify oa.audio oa.prices oa.funders oa.fees oa.rcuk oa.recommendations oa.funds oa.russell_group oa.colleges oa.blogs oa.finch_report oa.repositories oa.hei oa.libre oa.policies oa.journals

Date tagged:

10/13/2012, 10:15

Date published:

10/13/2012, 06:15