Why scientists should stop publishing - University World News

abernard102@gmail.com 2014-04-26

Summary:

Earlier this month a Japanese researcher was found guilty of scientific misconduct and two groundbreaking studies published in Nature were retracted. This is a symptom of a broken system. Ask most scientists why they pursued a career in research and the majority will tell you that they had an innate passion for discovery. However, the current 'publish or perish' culture in academia is arguably impeding the discovery process. Even Nobel laureates have spoken out about the negative impact of this culture, including Peter Higgs, who told the Guardian that even he would not be productive enough to compete in the current academic system. To be a successful academic you must publish research in peer-reviewed academic journals, and preferably 'high impact' journals such as Science and Nature. While the intention behind peer review – to maintain standards of quality – is critically important, the implementation of this process may actually be contributing to a systemic flaw ... Using an open access archive system as the primary way of communicating and evaluating science instead of peer reviewed academic journals may be an answer. Fields such as mathematics and physics already use online archives in addition to journals.  For example arXiv.org, hosted by Cornell University library, is a not-for-profit online platform where scientists upload their papers to share their most recent findings without having to spend time and resources trying to publish their work in a traditional journal.  Once papers are submitted to the archive, moderators organise the research into categories, papers are critiqued by other scientists in the field, and authors can then revise and re-submit in a transparent process.  Employing an archive system may (1) make research more accessible to other scientists and the general public (2) help save time and resources when sharing research and (3) reduce the emphasis on impact factor as a proxy of an article's importance.   At its core, science is a collaborative global community, intended to benefit everyone ..."

Link:

http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140424173116328

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » pontika.nancy@gmail.com's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.elife oa.bmc oa.plos oa.mandates oa.funders oa.uk oa.rcuk oa.gold oa.recommendations oa.repositories.disciplinary oa.arxiv oa.impact oa.jif oa.peer_review oa.npg oa.credibility oa.quality oa.comment oa.new ru.sparc oa.policies oa.journals oa.repositories oa.metrics oa.f1000research

Date tagged:

04/26/2014, 06:41

Date published:

04/26/2014, 00:56