Correcting the record: retracting papermill articles | UKSG

peter.suber's bookmarks 2024-04-01

Summary:

"Unfortunately, article retractions are typically perceived as a bad thing. Publishers can be reluctant to retract articles due to fear of being delisted from indexes such as Web of Science and Scopus and consequently receiving fewer high-quality article submissions. We need to change this narrative around retractions. Ultimately, the most important thing is that the scholarly record is trustworthy and accurate, enabling research to progress. Publishers should be encouraged to actively identify problematic articles in their portfolios and, when necessary, correct the scholarly record by issuing retractions or corrections...."

Link:

https://www.uksg.org/newsletter/uksg-enews-560/correcting-record-retracting-papermill-articles

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.retractions oa.quality oa.recommendations

Date tagged:

04/01/2024, 09:14

Date published:

04/01/2024, 05:14