Our future, we decide: five ways to reform the scientific publication process | Nature Reviews Endocrinology

"As a solution, a global peer reviewer database could be established, going beyond the current offerings of ScholarOne and Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Service. This database should be open and transparent, a dynamic and interactive platform that is accessible to editors and researchers. Journal editors could use it as a resource for reviewer identification. Scientists sign up, which expands the available reviewer pool, and display their peer-review experience when their assigned manuscripts are added to their profile...."