Version of record, and what Open Access must learn from Open Science | chem-bla-ics

peter.suber's bookmarks 2024-11-23

Summary:

"There is absolutely no reason not to have multiple versions of the same narrative, as long as they are clearly tagged. Open Science has been doing this for two decades, but publishers have been slacking. Retractions are updated versions of the same article, as are corrections, corrigendum, and errata. It is not that publishers do not know how to do it. Hesitently, they are accepting that preprints exist, but publishers tend to frame that as inferior versions."

Link:

https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2024/11/23/version-of-record.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Hanna_S's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.publishing oa.publishers oa.open_science oa.versions oa.preprints oa.twitter oa.mastodon oa.bluesky oa.social_media

Date tagged:

11/23/2024, 05:52

Date published:

11/23/2024, 04:11