The state of research assessment

"The research landscape is undergoing a profound and rapid transformation. As we champion trust and integrity, open access and open science, and greater inclusivity and equity, the ways in which research is conducted and shared are evolving. Researchers are increasingly encouraged to engage with diverse audiences, share their research data, and collaborate across disciplines. This shift challenges the academic community to rethink how researchers, and their work, should be evaluated.  

As a signatory of the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), Springer Nature has long advocated for a balanced approach to research assessment. We recognise that traditional metrics*, while historically significant and useful within specific remits, can’t capture the full spectrum of a researcher’s contributions. Researchers are also evaluated for many different reasons, with unique needs and methodologies. In response, we are actively adapting our practices to better support the needs of researchers, institutions and funding bodies as they evolve their assessment practices. 

This white paper represents a step towards achieving this goal. Drawing on the voices of over 6,600 researchers across diverse regions, career stages and disciplines, it is one of the largest surveys of its kind – and provides a lens through which we can understand the state of research assessment and the varied experiences, perceptions and wishes of researchers navigating this environment.  ..."