Public accessibility of biomedical articles from PubMed Central reduces journal readership—retrospective cohort analysis

peter.suber's bookmarks 2013-04-03

Summary:

Abstract:  Does PubMed Central —a government-run digital archive of biomedical articles— compete with scientific society journals? A longitudinal, retrospective cohort analysis of 13,223 articles (5999 treatment, 7224 control) published in 14 society-run biomedical research journals in nutrition, experimental biology, physiology, and radiology between February 2008 and January 2011 reveals a 21.4% reduction in full-text hypertext markup language (HTML) article downloads and a 13.8% reduction in portable document format (PDF) article downloads from the journals’ websites when U.S. National Institutes of Healthsponsored articles (treatment) become freely available from the PubMed Central repository. In addition, the effect of PubMed Central on reducing PDF article downloads is increasing over time, growing at a rate of 1.6% per year. There was no longitudinal effect for full-text HTML downloads. While PubMed Central may be providing complementary access to readers traditionally underserved by scientific journals, the loss of article readership from the journal website may weaken the ability of the journal to build communities of interest around research papers, impede the communication of news and events to scientific society members and journal readers, and reduce the perceived value of the journal to institutional subscribers.—Davis, P. M. Public accessibility of biomedical articles from PubMed Central reduces journal readership—retrospective cohort analysis

Link:

http://www.fasebj.org/content/early/2013/04/02/fj.13-229922.full.pdf+html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.medicine oa.new oa.societies oa.biomedicine oa.downloads oa.pmc

Date tagged:

04/03/2013, 16:42

Date published:

04/03/2013, 12:42