Open science: My insights into data sharing, preregistration, and replication.
peter.suber's bookmarks 2026-01-07
Summary:
Abstract: After a decade of implementing open science practices as a principal investigator, mentor, data repository founder, and editor-in-chief, I have learned that the question is not whether researchers should adopt these practices but how to adapt them meaningfully. This commentary, based on a talk given at the 2024 Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science conference, argues for two key principles: First, open science implementation must be context-dependent rather than one-size-fits-all, and second, practical research realities require flexible approaches to idealized policies. Through personal examples, from my evolution with preregistration from “recipe” to “guide” during COVID-19 research to challenges with Registered Reports using existing data sets, I show how open science practices work best when researchers approach them as evolving tools rather than rigid rules. I also discuss field-specific differences in open science uptake between psychology and education and the importance of equity considerations in implementation. The commentary concludes with concrete recommendations for researchers and journals, emphasizing that sustainable open science requires meeting researchers where they are while maintaining transparency and scientific rigour. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)
Impact Statement
Public Significance Statement—Open science practices like sharing research data and preplanning studies can make research more trustworthy and useful, but researchers often struggle with how to implement these practices in real-world situations. This commentary shows that rather than having rigid, one-size-fits-all rules for open science, we need flexible approaches that work for different types of research while still maintaining transparency and scientific quality. These insights can help Canadian researchers, funding agencies, and journals develop more practical and equitable policies that actually support better science rather than creating barriers for researchers with different resources or research contexts.