The uptake of open access in hybrid journal publishing

peter.suber's bookmarks 2026-02-27

Summary:

Abstract:  Hybrid open access has been the subject of considerable debate in scholarly communication for more than two decades. Under this model, academic journals make some articles openly available, typically for a fee, while others remain behind a paywall. Initially regarded as a means of transitioning from subscription-based journal publishing to full open access, limited evidence exists about whether this approach is achieving its intended purpose. The role of transformative agreements, a library licensing model addressing hybrid journal portfolios from established commercial publishers, is particularly disputed. Yet, bibliometric evidence on their uptake and underlying funding streams is largely unavailable. This doctoral thesis addresses these gaps by investigating open access uptake in hybrid journals following the introduction of transformative agreements through an open methodology based on open metadata.

This cumulative thesis comprises four studies. The first study examines 152 reverseflip journals that shifted from full open access to subscription models, including hybrid open access. The second study provides an article-level analysis of Elsevier’s hybrid journal portfolio consisting of roughly 2,000 hybrid journals between 2015 and 2019. The focus was on examining the role of initial open access agreements and policies on the activities of this major commercial publisher using publicly available metadata. Building on these case studies, the third and fourth studies present complementary large-scale analyses of over 13,000 hybrid journals and around ten million articles. Using Crossref, OpenAlex, and transformative agreement data from the international funder initiative cOAlition S, an open methodology was developed for this purpose. The third study investigates the period 2018-2022, while the fourth covers 2019-2023 and validates the open methodology by comparing its results with the proprietary databases Scopus and Web of Science at both journal and article levels.

The results reveal that although transformative agreements accounted for most growth in open access, the vast majority of articles remain behind paywalls. In 2023, only one in five articles was open access. Growth was predominantly driven by the three commercial publishers, Elsevier, Springer Nature, and Wiley, with substantial variations across journals and countries. The three most productive countries, China, the United States, and India, which accounted for roughly half of articles in hybrid journals, did not implemented transformative agreements as widely as European countries. This limits the overall growth of open access in hybrid journals. Results align strongly across open and proprietary data sources, which demonstrates the validity of the open methodology.
 
In conclusion, current levels of implementation of hybrid open access in general, and transformative agreements in particular, are insufficient to bring about a large-scale transition to full open access. Where these agreements are adopted, library consortia achieve high levels of open access. However, given differing global priorities and market concentration, the willingness of large commercial publishers to achieve a complete transition remains questionable. The comparative bibliometric approach adopted in this thesis demonstrates the use of open metadata for large-scale hybrid open access studies. Combining open metadata with proprietary databases provides a more robust understanding than using a single database, as it mitigates limitations in coverage and metadata quality. Implementing such evaluations could help ensure that hybrid open access and transformative agreements do not inadvertently create problematic incentives regarding how research is conducted, reported and evaluated. 

Link:

https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/377c1cb0-137c-4c50-9d6d-f69e722f49f5/content

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.hybrid oa.journals oa.publishing oa.offsets

Date tagged:

02/27/2026, 11:01

Date published:

02/27/2026, 06:01