SciPost:

peter.suber's bookmarks 2016-10-15

Summary:

From the "about" page:

  • Two-way open access Publicly-funded science should be openly accessible to scientists and the general public, perpetually, worldwide. Conversely, scientists should not have to pay publishing charges to disseminate the fruits of their research efforts.
  • Non-profit Academics do not perform research for profit, and by extension the publication of their scientific results should not involve commercial profit-making.
  • By Professionals Scientists should carry the final responsibility for all stages in the scientific publishing process.
  • Peer-witnessed refereeing Scientific publications should undergo the strictest possible peer refereeing process, witnessed by the community instead of hidden behind closed doors.
  • Accountable and credited refereeing Peer refereeing should be accountable, and should be incentivized by being credited.
  • Post-publication evaluation Peer evaluation does not stop at the moment of publication.

Link:

https://scipost.org/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.overlay oa.arxiv oa.no-fee oa.scipost oa.physics oa.platforms oa.infrastructure oa.floss oa.journals oa.open_peer_review oa.peer_review

Date tagged:

10/15/2016, 16:59

Date published:

10/15/2016, 12:53