[Elsevier's rationale for its non-disclosure clauses]

peter.suber's bookmarks 2016-12-26


"So it seems that Elsevier is once again trying to avoid revealing the prices that they charge university libraries for journal subscriptions. A few years ago they tried the same thing with us. Making prices public would harm the customer, they claimed. If prices were disclosed, they argued in one legal brief, “actual and substantial harm would result...to customers (particularly large customers such as [defendant] WSU) because— such information being known to competitors—Elsevier would be pressured into a onesize fits all pricing policy that would undermine its ability to advantageously tailor terms and conditions to a customer’s individual requirements.” I find this insufferable. Partly, it sounds like a threat: “Don't make me angry. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.” But the bigger issue is that as an economic argument it’s utter bullshit...."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.elsevier oa.obstacles oa.prices oa.monopoly

Date tagged:

12/26/2016, 09:29

Date published:

12/26/2016, 04:29