Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-05-28


"Global efforts are afoot to create a constructive role for journal metrics in scholarly publishing and to displace the dominance of impact factors in the assessment of research. To this end, a group of bibliometric and evaluation specialists, scientists, publishers, scientific societies and research-analytics providers are working to hammer out a broader suite of journal indicators, and other ways to judge a journal’s qualities. It is a challenging task: our interests vary and often conflict, and change requires a concerted effort across publishing, academia, funding agencies, policymakers and providers of bibliometric data.

Here we call for the essential elements of this change: expansion of indicators to cover all functions of scholarly journals, a set of principles to govern their use and the creation of a governing body to maintain these standards and their relevance...."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.jif oa.impact oa.recommendations oa.altmetrics oa.principles oa.journals oa.metrics

Date tagged:

05/28/2019, 11:40

Date published:

05/28/2019, 07:40