Open access, open data and peer review | Genome Biology | Full Text

peter.suber's bookmarks 2020-05-10

Summary:

"Thus, the article processing charges (APCs) of the top tier journals would increase if they were to switch to full open access, which could shift from inequity in access to published work to inequity in access to publishing, as scientists and their funders in emerging economies may be less capable of shouldering such APC costs [34]. Moreover, society journals and certain fields such as chemistry and humanities are particularly reliant on income from subscriptions to complement their relatively low APC revenues, and if they were less able to adapt, the full open access model could increase the monopoly of large publishing houses who can more easily change their business models [56]...."

Link:

https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-020-02005-3

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.plan_s oa.hybrid oa.data oa.biology oa.medicine oa.fees oa.objections oa.debates oa.misunderstandings oa.journals

Date tagged:

05/10/2020, 10:56

Date published:

05/10/2020, 06:56