Opinion | Open Access to Scientific Research - The New York Times

peter.suber's bookmarks 2020-10-15


"The Public Library of Science plans to confront that inequity by establishing a new series of peer-reviewed journals that will be freely available on the Internet. The first ones, published this October, will be PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine. The aim is to create a freer flow of data about research and results. The journals will pay for themselves by charging a small fee to the organizations and institutions that support the research.

Most of us, admittedly, will not have much use for free access to new discoveries in, say, particle physics. But it is a different matter when it comes to medical research. Popular nostrums abound on the Web, but it can be very hard, if not impossible, to find the results of properly vetted, taxpayer-financed science -- and in some cases it can be hard for your doctor to find them, too. The Public Library of Science could help change all that, creating open access to research. The publishers of scientific journals are naturally skeptical, but the real test will come in the marketplace of ideas. What will matter this fall, when the new journals make their debut, is how many scientists choose to publish in them rather than in the journals traditionally deemed the most prestigious in their disciplines...."




10/15/2020, 11:32

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.editorials oa.plos oa.gold oa.advocacy oa.journals

Date tagged:

10/15/2020, 15:32

Date published:

08/07/2003, 11:32