The ethics of open access publishing | BMC Medical Ethics | Full Text

peter.suber's bookmarks 2021-01-31

Summary:

Abstract:  Should those who work on ethics welcome or resist moves to open access publishing? This paper analyses arguments in favour and against the increasing requirement for open access publishing and considers their implications for bioethics research. In the context of biomedical science, major funders are increasingly mandating open access as a condition of funding and such moves are also common in other disciplines. Whilst there has been some debate about the implications of open-access for the social sciences and humanities, there has been little if any discussion about the implications of open access for ethics. This is surprising given both the central role of public reason and critique in ethics and the fact that many of the arguments made for and against open access have been couched in moral terms. In what follows I argue that those who work in ethics have a strong interest in supporting moves towards more open publishing approaches which have the potential both to inform and promote richer and more diverse forms of public deliberation and to be enriched by them. The importance of public deliberation in practical and applied ethics suggests that ethicists have a particular interest in the promotion of diverse and experimental forms of publication and debate and in supporting new, more creative and more participatory approaches to publication.

 

Link:

https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6939-14-16

Updated:

01/31/2021, 08:55

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.gold oa.fees oa.ethics oa.philosophy oa.humanities oa.biology oa.bioethics oa.mandates oa.funders oa.policies oa.policies.funders oa.ssh oa.journals

Date tagged:

01/31/2021, 13:56

Date published:

03/22/2013, 09:55