Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic | BMC Medical Research Methodology | Full Text

peter.suber's bookmarks 2021-06-09


Besançon, L., Peiffer-Smadja, N., Segalas, C. et al. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Res Methodol 21, 117 (2021).


In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks

Tags: oa.open_science oa.medicine oa.practices oa.preregistration oa.peer_review oa.preprints oa.versions oa.quality oa.implementation oa.recommendations oa.humanitarian oa.benefits

Date tagged:

06/09/2021, 04:16

Date published:

06/09/2021, 08:49