Why the snippet tax of the EU Copyright Directive is pointless and doomed to fail – Walled Culture

peter.suber's bookmarks 2022-03-28

Summary:

"The EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market contains two spectacularly bad ideas. One is the upload filter of Article 17, which will wreak havoc not just on creativity in the EU, but also on freedom of speech there, as algorithms block perfectly legal material. The other concerns the “snippet tax” of Article 15, more formally known as ancillary copyright..

Just as the impetus for the upload filter came from the music and film industries, so the lobbying for Article 15 came from newspaper publishers. The logic behind their demand, such as it was, seemed to be that Google was making money from ads on its pages that had some links to newspaper sites. That ignored two inconvenient facts. First, that Google’s dedicated news site, Google News, had precisely zero ads on its pages. And secondly, the pages on the main Google search engine that did have ads, had many other search hits alongside links to newspapers. And those links to newspaper sites send a considerable flow of traffic, that publishers have repeatedly shown they are desperate to have...."

Link:

https://walledculture.org/why-the-snippet-tax-of-the-eu-copyright-directive-is-pointless-and-doomed-to-fail/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.copyright oa.europe oa.legislation oa.news oa.journalism

Date tagged:

03/28/2022, 09:27

Date published:

03/28/2022, 05:27