MetaArXiv Preprints | Reproducible research practices and transparency across linguistics

peter.suber's bookmarks 2023-01-14


Abstract:  Scientific studies of language span across many disciplines and provide evidence for social, cultural, cognitive, technological, and biomedical studies of human nature and behavior. By becoming increasingly empirical and quantitative, linguistics has been facing challenges and limitations of the scientific practices that pose barriers to reproducibility and replicability. One of the proposed solutions to the widely acknowledged reproducibility and replicability crisis has been the implementation of transparency practices, e.g. open access publishing, preregistrations, sharing study materials, data, and analyses, performing study replications and declaring conflicts of interest. Here, we have assessed the prevalence of these practices in randomly sampled 600 journal articles from linguistics across two time points. In line with similar studies in other disciplines, we found a moderate amount of articles published open access, but overall low rates of sharing materials, data, and protocols, no preregistrations, very few replications and low rates of conflict of interest reports. These low rates have not increased noticeably between 2008/2009 and 2018/2019, pointing to remaining barriers and slow adoption of open and reproducible research practices in linguistics. As linguistics has not yet firmly established transparency and reproducibility as guiding principles in research, we provide recommendations and solutions for facilitating the adoption of these practices.



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.reproducibility oa.transparency oa.linguistics oa.ssh oa.protocols oa.preregistration oa.negative oa.practices oa.recommendations oa.ssh

Date tagged:

01/14/2023, 12:05

Date published:

01/14/2023, 07:05