Comments on EC Council Conclusions on scholarly publishing | Sesame Open Science

peter.suber's bookmarks 2023-06-06


"I think these Council Conclusions are very welcome and important, as they align with, and in turn can support, a number of important current developments in how open access is perceived and implemented. One of these is the growing awareness, also among research institutions and funders, of the inequality and unsustainability of APC-driven open access publishing, especially by commercial or otherwise revenue-driven publishers. Another is a growing emphasis on important qualitative aspects of open access, in particular immediacy and open licensing. In this sense, the Council Conclusions, together with for example the UNESCO Open Science Recommendations and the Action Plan for Diamond Open Access, to name but two, can help shift focus to other models of publishing. One thing I would like to emphasize is that while developing new publishing infrastructures (for example at national or even European level) is in itself a worthwhile avenue to pursue, many examples also already exist of non-profit publishing solutions that deserve support and recognition...."


From feeds:

[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.nonprofit in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.infrastructure in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.secondary_pub_rights oa.publishers oa.ore oa.nonprofit oa.licensing oa.infrastructure oa.fees oa.europe oa.embargoes oa.europe

Date tagged:

06/06/2023, 08:44

Date published:

06/06/2023, 04:44