My submission to the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee « Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week #AcademicSpring

peter.suber's bookmarks 2013-01-12

Summary:

"In the last couple of days, the House of Lords (the upper house of the UK government) has issued a call for evidence for a short inquiry into the Government’s open access policy and its implementation by the Research Councils UK (RCUK)....The rest of this post is my submission....I hold it as a key principle that the interests of one small group – publishers – must not be allowed to compromise decisions made on behalf of all other stake-holders. In particular, the government of the UK is beholden to its citizens, not to the publishing industry. The government must make decisions that promote the welfare of citizens rather than decisions that suit any one industry....Publishers must not be allowed to dictate policy that prioritises their own interests above those of universities, learned societies and citizens. Publishers are properly considered as service-providers, analogous to the vendors who provide the computers that researchers use for word-processing as they write their papers. They are important to the process but do not merit a place at the table when deciding on policy...."

Link:

http://svpow.com/2013/01/12/my-submission-to-the-house-of-lords-science-and-technology-committee/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.mandates oa.green oa.consultations oa.uk oa.repositories oa.policies oa.journals

Date tagged:

01/12/2013, 08:55

Date published:

01/12/2013, 03:55