I Got the Wrong Request from the Wrong Journal to Review the Wrong Piece. The Wrong kind of Open Access Apparently, Something Wrong with this Inherently…

Connotea Imports 2012-07-31

Summary:

"Yesterday I screened my spam-folder. Between all male enhancement and lottery winner announcements, and phishing mails for my bank account, there was an invitation to peer review a paper in “SCIENCE JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY”....I don’t know what alarmed me first. The odd hard returns, the journal using a Gmail address, an invitation for a topic (autism) I knew nothing about, an abstract that didn’t make sense and has nothing to do with Pathology, the odd style of the letter: the informal, but impersonal introduction (How are you? I am sure you are busy with many activities right now) combined with a turgid style (the paper addresses issues of value to our broad-based audience, and that it cuts through the thick layers of theory and verbosity for them and makes sense of it all in a clean, cohesive manner) and some misspellings. And then I never had an invitation from an editor, starting with the impersonal “Colleagues”… "

Link:

http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/i-got-the-wrong-request-from-the-wrong-journal-to-review-the-wrong-piece-the-wrong-kind-of-open-access-apparently-something-wrong-with-this-inherently/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Connotea Imports

Tags:

ru.no oa.journals oa.new oa.comment

Authors:

petersuber

Date tagged:

07/31/2012, 12:48

Date published:

08/27/2011, 22:41