Is open access sufficient? A review of the quality of open-access nursing journals

Jeffrey Beall's bookmarks 2014-11-18

Summary:

The present study aims to review the quality of open-access nursing journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals that published papers in 2013 with a nursing focus, written in English, and were freely accessible. Each journal was reviewed in relation to their publisher, year of commencement, number of papers published in 2013, fee for publication, indexing, impact factor, and evidence of requirements for ethics and disclosure statements. The quality of the journals was assessed by impact factors and the requirements for indexing in PubMed. A total of 552 were published in 2013 in the 19 open-access nursing journals that met the inclusion criteria. No journals had impact factors listed in Web of Knowledge, but three had low Scopus impact factors. Only five journals were indexed with PubMed. The quality of the 19 journals included in the review was evaluated as inferior to most subscription-fee journals. Mental health nursing has some responsibility to the general public, and in particular, consumers of mental health services and their families, for the quality of papers published in open-access journals. The way forward might involve dual-platform publication or a process that enables assessment of how research has improved clinical outcomes.

Link:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.12098/abstract;jsessionid=324EBCA4A3298C68199DFD26EE71A433.f03t03

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป Jeffrey Beall's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.nursing oa.new oa.predatory oa.quality

Date tagged:

11/18/2014, 10:42

Date published:

11/18/2014, 05:42