Fred Friend on Martin Hall on Finch Report & RCUK OA Policy

Connotea: stevanharnad's bookmarks matching tag 2012-11-13


"...The argument put forward in the Finch Report is not only that repositories cannot provide a high-quality sustainable service but also that even if they could, a publisher-led approach is desirable. No evidence is put forward to support this key point in the Finch Report. The case for a transition to gold open access is not evidence-based but based upon a perceived threat to the publishing industry from any policy which gives a substantial role to repositories as an alternative source of supply of research articles. The case for “sustainability” presented in the Finch Report is a case for sustainability of the publishing industry... As a result of reading Martin’s article and re-reading the Finch Report I am no further forward in understanding how the open access advocates on the Finch Group could have signed up to the Report, even though they may have been out-voted by the publisher and society members..."



11/12/2012, 12:00

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Connotea: stevanharnad's bookmarks matching tag
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amsciforum

Tags: oa.mandates fred friend martin hall oa.finch_report oa.rcuk oa.policies



Date tagged:

11/13/2012, 01:48

Date published:

11/12/2012, 11:56