Gold Open Access: Counting the Costs | Ariadne

Connotea: stevehit's bookmarks matching tag oa.new 2012-12-17

Summary:

Use the link to access the full text article from Ariadne magazine.  An excerpt reads as follows: "Research Councils UK (RCUK) have recently announced a significant amendment to their open access (OA)  policy which requires all research papers that result from research partly or wholly funded by RCUK to be made open access ... A subsequent clarification from RCUK stated that Gold OA is the preferred mechanism of choice to realise open access for outputs that they have funded and have announced the award of block grants to eligible institutions to achieve this aim [2]. Where a Gold OA option is unavailable, Green OA is also acceptable; however, RCUK have indicated that the decision will be ultimately left up to institutions as to which route to take [3].  Since RCUK are the major funder of research in the United Kingdom, this new policy will not only have a major impact on how researchers publish their work, but also huge implications for their budgets. Many research institutions funded by RCUK are currently investigating how they will implement this policy and are looking at the costs for open access publication, and how they can support the adoption of open access within their organisation. The ball is very much in the court of institutions to decide how to play the open access game.  One of the key factors that will affect institutions is the cost that publishers will set for their APCs. So far RCUK have steered clear of suggesting an appropriate fee, leaving individual publishers to determine the market level of the APCs as per the current situation. Meanwhile there seems to be a huge variability in costs. There is a general expectation that over time APCs will settle to a reasonable rate and similarly journal subscriptions will lower to reflect the gradual change in business model from subscription fees to APCs. Most publishers have not yet been upfront about what impact they will have on journal subscriptions, if any, and it is hard to access and assess real-life data. RSC Publishing is one notable exception since it has introduced a system of waiving a proportion of APC fees based on institutional subscription costs.  Much of this transition period to full open access will have to be navigated through uncharted territory, where no one has a clear handle on the costs involved. The rationale of this article is to present data on article processing charges gathered over the past five years, report on trends seen within this data, to suggest some approaches and to generally contribute to and inform the policy discussion..."

Link:

http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue70/andrew

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Connotea: stevehit's bookmarks matching tag oa.new
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new pep.oa pep.biblio oa.data oa.gold oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.licensing oa.mandates oa.green oa.universities oa.copyright oa.uk oa.impact oa.costs oa.prestige oa.prices oa.hybrid oa.funders oa.fees oa.wellcome oa.jif oa.rcuk oa.funds oa.studies oa.budgets oa.ariadne oa.colleges oa.finch_report oa.sherpa.romeo oa.hefce oa.ref oa.u.edinburgh oa.repositories oa.hei oa.libre oa.policies oa.journals oa.metrics

Authors:

stevehit

Date tagged:

12/17/2012, 13:28

Date published:

12/17/2012, 06:34