Takings, Standing, and Those Nasty Neighbors

Legal Planet: Environmental Law and Policy 2013-03-06

Summary:

Most lawyers reading this page are familiar with Nollan v. Calif. Coastal Comm’n, the 1987 Supreme Court case holding that exactions in exchange for land use permits must show an “essential nexus” between the purported harm generated by the permit and aims of the exaction.  (More precisely, Nollan gave heightened scrutiny to finding that nexus.).  [...]

Link:

http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/takings-standing-and-those-nasty-neighbors/

From feeds:

Berkeley Law Library -- Reference & Research Services » Legal Planet: Environmental Law and Policy

Tags:

land use robert jackson litigation regulatory takings nollan v. california coastal comm'n takings law williamson county regional planning comm'n v. hamilton bank defenders of wildlife v. lujan standing doctrine

Authors:

Jonathan Zasloff

Date tagged:

03/06/2013, 23:47

Date published:

03/06/2013, 17:53