Federal District Court Rebuffs Trump Labor Board for Shirking Rulemaking Requirements

Center for Progressive Reform 2020-06-03

Summary:

For decades, commentators have complained about how long it can take for workers attempting to unionize to simply get an election in which workers make an up-or-down decision on whether to form a union. For many years, employers were able to raise hyper-formalistic legal arguments that took so long to resolve that the employees initially interested in forming a union had often moved on to other employment. In far too many cases, employers also unlawfully coerce workers during the delay, and those workers eventually withdraw their support for the union. After much internal wrangling, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) enacted a series of new election procedures in 2014, but after Donald Trump took office, the Board published a “Request for Information” in December 2017 that implicitly questioned the continuing need for, and efficacy of, a rule that was little more than two years old.

Link:

http://progressivereform.org/cpr-blog/federal-district-court-rebuffs-trump-labor-board-shirking-rulemaking-requirements/

From feeds:

Berkeley Law Library -- Reference & Research Services » Center for Progressive Reform

Tags:

Authors:

Michael C. Duff

Date tagged:

06/03/2020, 14:24

Date published:

06/03/2020, 11:08