Finch inquiry's open access tune won't resonate in Australia

Amsciforum 2012-06-24


The bad news is that the Committee, which included universities, librarians and publishers among others, has favoured the “gold” approach for facilitating access to research. It downplays the less costly option of making work available through public databases – called repositories. This is often referred to as the “green” route to open access. Economic modelling shows that for research universities, the green route to open access is more cost effective than the gold…. Australia, by comparison is favouring a green open access future. The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has recently taken a pragmatic and cost effective approach to open access with their new open access policy. This will require researchers to make a version of their funded published work available in their institutional repository.


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) »
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amsciforum

Tags: oa.mandates oa.comment oa.government oa.universities oa.libraries oa.australia oa.costs oa.books oa.hybrid oa.fees oa.recommendations oa.studies oa.budgets oa.nhmrc oa.arc oa.finch_report oa.repositories oa.hei oa.policies oa.journals



Date tagged:

06/24/2012, 00:24

Date published:

06/23/2012, 22:58