Zoroastrian "heaven"
Language Log 2025-01-23
[This is a guest post by Chris Button]
I think I might finally have figured out heaven:
tiān 天 LMC tʰian, EMC tʰɛn, OC xjəm
xiān 祆 LMC xian, EMC xɛn, OC xəɲ ~ xjəm
It's Pulleyblank's formulation (xj- > tʰ ; -jəm > -ɛn), but it also explains why x- is retained in 祆 because of it using the intermediary stage -əɲ (between OC -jəm and EMC -ɛn) as the OC source of the EMC form (where OC x- > EMC x-) rather than -jəm (where OC xj- > EMC tʰ-).
As discussed by Pulleyblank elsewhere (e.g. with 年 vs 稔 ), the palatalization of the coda in -ɛn < -jəm only occurs in ping sheng (to overlap with regular -ɛn < -əɲ). So, the xiesheng derivative tiǎn 忝 "shame" (with 天 as phonetic) regularly reconstructs as LMC tʰiam´, EMC tʰɛmˀ, OC xjᵊmɁ with EMC ɛmˀ rather than ɛnˀ.
Two further things to consider:
-
丁 does not after all appear to be phonetic in 天 despite it sometimes appearing that way in the earliest inscriptions.
-
The source of Indo-European "heaven" seems to be unresolved. Pokorny suggests (s)kʲəm- "cover" as the source of the words "heaven" and "shame". Semantically, that happens to compare with 天 "heaven" and 忝 "shame" in Chinese. And then if we really want to speculate, OC xjəm and IE kʲəm- do look rather similar, but that is most likely coincidental!
Selected readings
- "Hu Shih and God: thearchs across Eurasia" (12/28/24)
- "'Lord of Heaven' in ancient Sino-Iranian" (5/28/24)
- "Some Old Chinese terms relating to religion, mythology, ritual" (9/17/23)
- Pulleyblank, Edwin G. "The Ganzhi as phonograms and their application to the calendar", Early China 16 (1991), 39 – 80
- Pulleyblank, Edwin G. "The Ganzhi as phonograms: An emendation", Early China News #8 (1995), 29 – 32.
- Pulleyblank, Edwin G “The Historical and Prehistorical Relationships of Chinese.” In Wang (ed.) The Ancestry of the Chinese Language, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series No. 8. Berkeley, California (1995), 145-194