Our proposal for scheduled post-publication review: “Even if each review took twice the effort of the average pre-publication review, our system would add only 1 percent to the total reviewing effort, while providing important perspectives on papers representing more than one-quarter of the citations received by these influential journals.”
Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science 2025-02-26
Summary:
The current system of scholarly journal review is absolutely nuts. The vast majority of review effort goes to papers that nobody reads. We can do better via scheduled post-publication review, for example every time a paper reaches its 250th citation, … Continue reading →