Should I Help My Patients Die? - The New York Times

peter.suber's bookmarks 2017-08-06

Summary:

"California’s law permits physicians to prescribe a lethal cocktail to patients who request it and meet certain criteria: They must be adults expected to die within six months who are able to self-administer the drug and retain the mental capacity to make a decision like this....But that is where the law leaves off. The details of patient selection and protocol, even the composition of the lethal compound, are left to the individual doctor or hospital policy. Our hospital, like many others at that time, was still in the early stages of creating a policy and procedure. To me and many of my colleagues in California, it felt as if the law had passed so quickly that we weren’t fully prepared to deal with it. That aside, the idea of hastening death is uncomfortable for many doctors. In its original version, the Hippocratic oath states, “I will not administer poison to anyone when asked to do so, nor suggest such a course.” The American Medical Association, the nation’s largest association of doctors, has been formally opposed to the practice for 23 years. Its ethical and judicial council has recently begun to study the issue further....I understood. I could imagine my own distress in his condition — being shuttled like a bag of bones between the nursing home and the hospital. It was his legal right to request this intervention from me. But given how uncomfortable I was feeling, was it my right to say no? ..."

Link:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/05/opinion/sunday/dying-doctors-palliative-medicine.html

From feeds:

Consent and coercion » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

consent paternalism suicide suicide.assisted harm competence euthanasia harm.self

Date tagged:

08/06/2017, 14:00

Date published:

08/06/2017, 10:01