The secretive world of biomedical research - Research Information

gavinbaker's bookmarks 2015-07-12


I was, for many years, a typical publisher of scientific books and journals, but when the web arrived in the 1990s, I had a partial conversion and helped to create an online community for scientists (BioMedNet) and an associated web magazine (HMS Beagle). Soon afterwards, I realised that it was both possible and important to provide open, public access to research articles that were normally locked away behind subscription barriers. I launched the first open access publisher, BioMed Central, and was part of a small group of key individuals involved in launching the first open access repository, PubMed Central in 2000. I was the only publisher in that group; the others were scientists.   I continue to be a passionate advocate of open, online public access to scientific research and have since launched F1000 – an online community of more than 10,000 biomedical experts who help scientists to discover, write and publish research. We are working hard to try to tackle what we regard as ‘the deadly sins’ of science publishing, particularly problems around secrecy and delay. For example, I find it incredible that researchers who wish to publish findings in the fields of biology and medicine are accustomed to delays that regularly run anywhere from six months to one year before their results become public in scientific journals. Who benefits from this delay? Why is no one complaining? ... The editors who exert control over the publication process decide what and when to publish (or perhaps more often, what not to publish), but may not always be experts in the specific topic of the individual paper to really make this decision. They rely on the undisclosed advice of secretly appointed referees, who may do their work poorly (nobody but the editor will know), and may have obvious conflicts of interest (for example, they might be a direct competitor).

About two years ago, we started publishing research articles in a completely new way via an F1000 service called F1000Research – an author-led publishing platform for biological and medical research that makes no editorial decisions, performs no secret refereeing, and removes the delay in publishing. F1000Research is an open science publishing platform that uses a process of immediate publication (after an internal ‘hygiene’ check) followed by transparent peer review by invited experts, post-publication. All research articles are required to include the underlying source data, and all article types are encouraged, not only large research articles and reviews, but also short articles, negative findings, software articles, case histories, and many other valuable forms of research reporting currently shunned by many journals ..."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » gavinbaker's bookmarks

Tags: oa.comment oa.bmc oa.f1000 oa.f1000research oa.pmc oa.social_networks oa.peer_review oa.biology oa.medicine oa.biomedicine oa.repositories oa.journals

Date tagged:

07/12/2015, 08:11

Date published:

07/12/2015, 04:11