Paradoxical Infrastructures: Ruins, Retrofit, and Risk
Zotero / D&S Group / Top-Level Items 2024-08-19
Item Type
Journal Article
Author
Cymene Howe
Author
Jessica Lockrem
Author
Hannah Appel
Author
Edward Hackett
Author
Dominic Boyer
Author
Randal Hall
Author
Matthew Schneider-Mayerson
Author
Albert Pope
Author
Akhil Gupta
Author
Elizabeth Rodwell
Author
Andrea Ballestero
Author
Trevor Durbin
Author
Farès el-Dahdah
Author
Elizabeth Long
Author
Cyrus Mody
URL
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24778133
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
547-565
Publication
Science, Technology, & Human Values
ISSN
0162-2439
Date
2016
Extra
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Accessed
2024-08-19 03:44:05
Library Catalog
JSTOR
Abstract
In recent years, a dramatic increase in the study of infrastructure has occurred in the social sciences and humanities, following upon foundational work in the physical sciences, architecture, planning, information science, and engineering. This article, authored by a multidisciplinary group of scholars, probes the generative potential of infrastructure at this historical juncture. Accounting for the conceptual and material capacities of infrastructure, the article argues for the importance of paradox in understanding infrastructure. Thematically the article is organized around three key points that speak to the study of infrastructure: ruin, retrofit, and risk. The first paradox of infrastructure, ruin, suggests that even as infrastructure is generative, it degenerates. A second paradox is found in retrofit, an apparent ontological oxymoron that attempts to bridge temporality from the present to the future and yet ultimately reveals that infrastructural solidity, in material and symbolic terms, is more apparent than actual. Finally, a third paradox of infrastructure, risk, demonstrates that while a key purpose of infrastructure is to mitigate risk, it also involves new risks as it comes to fruition. The article concludes with a series of suggestions and provocations to view the study of infrastructure in more contingent and paradoxical forms.
Short Title
Paradoxical Infrastructures