Judge in StemExpress case refuses to renew injunction against release of videos, citing First Amendment

The Volokh Conspiracy 2015-08-23

Summary:

Last week, I blogged about StemExpress v. Center for Medical Progress. In that case, a California trial court had originally temporarily blocked the Center from releasing surreptitiously recorded video of a conversation with “leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers,” but later suggested that a more permanent injunction shouldn’t be issued. […]

Link:

http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/669424/s/493819c3/sc/7/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cnews0Cvolokh0Econspiracy0Cwp0C20A150C0A80C230Cjudge0Ein0Estemexpress0Ecase0Erefuses0Eto0Erenew0Einjunction0Eagainst0Erelease0Eof0Evideos0Eciting0Efirst0Eamendment0C/story01.htm

From feeds:

Cyberlaw » The Volokh Conspiracy

Tags:

freedom of speech

Authors:

Eugene Volokh

Date tagged:

08/23/2015, 13:32

Date published:

08/23/2015, 10:12