It’s time to rewrite the rules for expert testimony in federal court

The Volokh Conspiracy 2015-10-13

Summary:

Regular readers of this blog know that I’ve written a series of blog posts and a couple of law review articles decrying the way many federal courts, including and especially the courts of appeals, have ignored the language of amended Federal Rule of Evidence 702, the primary rule governing the admissibility of expert testimony. Instead, […]

Link:

http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/c/34656/f/669424/s/4a9b0248/sc/7/l/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cnews0Cvolokh0Econspiracy0Cwp0C20A150C10A0C120Cits0Etime0Eto0Erewrite0Ethe0Erules0Efor0Eexpert0Etestimony0Ein0Efederal0Ecourt0C/story01.htm

From feeds:

Cyberlaw » The Volokh Conspiracy

Tags:

junk science and quackspertise

Authors:

David Bernstein

Date tagged:

10/13/2015, 18:36

Date published:

10/12/2015, 09:32