‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics | BMC Medicine

lkfitz's bookmarks 2016-08-18


"A negative consequence of the rapid growth of scholarly open access publishing funded by article processing charges is the emergence of publishers and journals with highly questionable marketing and peer review practices. These so-called predatory publishers are causing unfounded negative publicity for open access publishing in general. Reports about this branch of e-business have so far mainly concentrated on exposing lacking peer review and scandals involving publishers and journals. There is a lack of comprehensive studies about several aspects of this phenomenon, including extent and regional distribution."




08/18/2016, 09:00

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks


oa.new oa.predatory oa.publishing oa.growth oa.gold oa.fees oa.peer_review oa.case.journals oa.bealls_list oa.doaj oa.journals oa.quality oa.credibility oa.monitoring

Date tagged:

08/18/2016, 14:55

Date published:

10/01/2015, 09:00