Impact of Social Sciences – We have the technology to save peer review – now it is up to our communities to implement it

lkfitz's bookmarks 2017-09-12

Summary:

"In such a system, published objects could be preprints, data, software, or any other digital research output. Quality control would be provided by having a system of semi-automated but managed and open peer review, with public interaction, collaboration, and transparent refinement through version control. Community moderation and crowdsourcing would play an important role, preventing underdeveloped feedback that is not constructive and could delay efficient research progress."

Link:

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/09/11/we-have-the-technology-to-save-peer-review-now-it-is-up-to-our-communities-to-implement-it/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.peer_review oa.assessment oa.crowd oa.orcid oa.dois oa.badges

Date tagged:

09/12/2017, 19:11

Date published:

09/12/2017, 15:11