If the Barcode Doesn’t Fit: Reconsidering ‘Bodily Incorporation’ in Patent Law

Patent – Patently-O 2024-09-12

Summary:

by Dennis Crouch

Many of us feel the daily pull toward coffee, and perhaps likewise toward PTAB decisions about coffee makers.

I found interesting a recent pair of IPR decisions successfully brought by the Swiss Nespresso against German competitor K-Fee.  This post delves into these cases and what I call the 'glove doesn't fit' fallacy in patent law obviousness doctrine; it also provides a discussion of how written description continues to be a risk, even in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Continue reading this post on Patently-O.

Link:

https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/09/barcode-reconsidering-incorporation.html

From feeds:

CLS / ROC » Patent – Patently-O

Tags:

paid

Authors:

Dennis Crouch

Date tagged:

09/12/2024, 23:52

Date published:

09/12/2024, 13:57