Supreme Court denies Cert

Patent – Patently-O 2024-10-07

Summary:

by Dennis Crouch

The Supreme Court has denied certiorari in all of the patent cases it considered in its  first conference of the October 2024 term:

  • Denied: 23-1349 Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc..  Does an on sale product constitute a printed publication that can be asserted in an IPR.
  • Denied: 23-1298 United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc. Whether the IPR statute and SAS require the Federal Circuit to review de novo, or only for an abuse of discretion, the PTO's reliance on new grounds and new printed publications—not raised in the initial petition?
  • Denied: 23-1231 Cellect, LLC v. Vidal.  Whether a patent procured in good faith can be invalidated on the ground that statutory Patent Term Adjustment created an improper term extension under the judge-made doctrine of obviousness type double patenting.
  • Denied: 23-1217 Chestek PLLC v. Vidal. Whether the PTO is exempt from notice-and-comment requirements when exercising its rulemaking power under 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2).
  • Denied: 23-1184 Eolas Technologies v.

Continue reading this post on Patently-O.

Link:

https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/10/supreme-court-denies.html

From feeds:

CLS / ROC » Patent – Patently-O

Tags:

paid

Authors:

Dennis Crouch

Date tagged:

10/07/2024, 21:25

Date published:

10/07/2024, 11:33