Home CLS / ROC LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® The infringement that never has to say “likelihood of confusion”

The infringement that never has to say “likelihood of confusion”

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® 2024-12-07

Summary:

Originally posted 2010-09-06 15:36:21. Republished by Blog Post PromoterProfessor Eric Goldman writes about the latest unfortunate development in the extension of “initial interest confusion,” that “infringement” of the Lanham Act that continues the trend eviscerating the doctrine of nominative fair use. Initial interest confusion, which means that no real damages were suffered by the trademark […]

The post The infringement that never has to say “likelihood of confusion” appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.

Link:

https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/the-infringement-that-never-has-to-say-likelihood-of-confusion/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-infringement-that-never-has-to-say-likelihood-of-confusion

From feeds:

CLS / ROC » LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®

Tags:

and

Authors:

Ron Coleman

Date tagged:

12/07/2024, 12:35

Date published:

12/06/2024, 14:54