What Packingham v. North Carolina Should Mean for the DMCA

Of Interest 2017-06-22

Summary:

The US Supreme Court issued opinions in two important First Amendment cases this week, one of which obviously had to do with intellectual property law (Matal v. Tam) and one of which didn’t (Packingham v. North Carolina). There is, however, an implicit IP angle in Packingham that’s worth exploring, and it relates to online copyright enforcement.

Location

United States
See map: Google Maps

Link:

http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2017/06/what-packingham-v-north-carolina-should-mean-dmca

From feeds:

CLS / ROC » Of Interest

Tags:

Authors:

Annemarie Bridy

Date tagged:

06/22/2017, 18:51

Date published:

06/20/2017, 21:34